TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term cardiovascular outcomes among immigrants and non-immigrants in cardiac resynchronization therapy
T2 - a nationwide study
AU - Krøll, Johanna
AU - Kristensen, Søren Lund
AU - Jespersen, Camilla H B
AU - Philbert, Berit
AU - Vinther, Michael
AU - Risum, Niels
AU - Johansen, Jens Brock
AU - Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
AU - Riahi, Sam
AU - Haarbo, Jens
AU - Fosbøl, Emil L
AU - Torp-Pedersen, Christian
AU - Køber, Lars
AU - Tfelt-Hansen, Jacob
AU - Weeke, Peter E
N1 - © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
PY - 2023/6/2
Y1 - 2023/6/2
N2 - AIMS: To date, potential differences in outcomes for immigrants and non-immigrants with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), in a European setting, remain underutilized and unknown. Hence, we examined the efficacy of CRT measured by heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality among immigrants and non-immigrants.METHODS AND RESULTS: All immigrants and non-immigrants who underwent first-time CRT implantation in Denmark (2000-2017) were identified from nationwide registries and followed for up to 5 years. Differences in HF related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality were evaluated by Cox regression analyses. From 2000 to 2017, 369 of 10 741 (3.4%) immigrants compared with 7855 of 223 509 (3.5%) non-immigrants with a HF diagnosis underwent CRT implantation. The origins of the immigrants were Europe (61.2%), Middle East (20.1%), Asia-Pacific (11.9%), Africa (3.5%), and America (3.3%). We found similar high uptake of HF guideline-directed pharmacotherapy before and after CRT and a consistent reduction in HF-related hospitalizations the year before vs. the year after CRT (61% vs. 39% for immigrants and 57% vs. 35% for non-immigrants). No overall difference in 5-year mortality among immigrants and non-immigrants was seen after CRT [24.1% and 25.8%, respectively, P-value = 0.50, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-1.7]. However, immigrants of Middle Eastern origin had a higher mortality rate (HR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1) compared with non-immigrants. Cardiovascular causes were responsible for the majority of deaths irrespective of immigration status (56.7% and 63.9%, respectively).CONCLUSION: No overall differences in efficacy of CRT in improving outcomes between immigrants and non-immigrants were identified. Although numbers were low, a higher mortality rate among immigrants of Middle Eastern origin was identified compared with non-immigrants.
AB - AIMS: To date, potential differences in outcomes for immigrants and non-immigrants with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), in a European setting, remain underutilized and unknown. Hence, we examined the efficacy of CRT measured by heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality among immigrants and non-immigrants.METHODS AND RESULTS: All immigrants and non-immigrants who underwent first-time CRT implantation in Denmark (2000-2017) were identified from nationwide registries and followed for up to 5 years. Differences in HF related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality were evaluated by Cox regression analyses. From 2000 to 2017, 369 of 10 741 (3.4%) immigrants compared with 7855 of 223 509 (3.5%) non-immigrants with a HF diagnosis underwent CRT implantation. The origins of the immigrants were Europe (61.2%), Middle East (20.1%), Asia-Pacific (11.9%), Africa (3.5%), and America (3.3%). We found similar high uptake of HF guideline-directed pharmacotherapy before and after CRT and a consistent reduction in HF-related hospitalizations the year before vs. the year after CRT (61% vs. 39% for immigrants and 57% vs. 35% for non-immigrants). No overall difference in 5-year mortality among immigrants and non-immigrants was seen after CRT [24.1% and 25.8%, respectively, P-value = 0.50, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-1.7]. However, immigrants of Middle Eastern origin had a higher mortality rate (HR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1) compared with non-immigrants. Cardiovascular causes were responsible for the majority of deaths irrespective of immigration status (56.7% and 63.9%, respectively).CONCLUSION: No overall differences in efficacy of CRT in improving outcomes between immigrants and non-immigrants were identified. Although numbers were low, a higher mortality rate among immigrants of Middle Eastern origin was identified compared with non-immigrants.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162688339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/europace/euad148
DO - 10.1093/europace/euad148
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37335977
SN - 1099-5129
VL - 25
JO - Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
JF - Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
IS - 6
M1 - euad148
ER -