Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Left axis deviation in patients with left bundle branch block is a marker of myocardial disease associated with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Early diastolic strain rate in relation to long term prognosis following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Global longitudinal strain predicts atrial fibrillation in individuals without hypertension: A Community-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Prognostic value of right ventricular echocardiographic measures in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Assessment of patients with a suspected cardioembolic ischemic stroke. A national consensus statement

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

AIMS: Patients with left axis deviation (LAD) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) show less benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared to other LBBB-patients. This study investigates the reasons for this.

METHODS: Sixty-eight patients eligible for CRT were included. Patients were divided into groups according to QRS-axis; normal axis (NA), left axis deviation (LAD) and right axis deviation (RAD). Before CRT implantation CMR imaging was performed to evaluate scar tissue. Echocardiography was performed before and after implantation. The electrical substrate was assessed by measuring interlead electrical delays. Response was evaluated after 8 months by left ventricular (LV) remodelling and clinical response.

RESULTS: Forty-four (65%) patients were responders in terms of LV remodelling. The presence of LAD was found to be independently associated with a poor LV remodelling non-response OR 0.21 [95% CI 0.06-0.77] (p = 0.02). Patients with axis deviation had more myocardial scar tissue (1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 0.9 ± 0.6, P = 0.04), more severe LV hypertrophy (14 (64%) and 6 (60%) vs. 7 (29%), P = 0.05) and tended to have a shorter interlead electrical delay than patients with NA (79 ± 40 ms vs. 92 ± 48 ms, P = 0.07). A high scar tissue burden was more pronounced in non-responders (1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 1.0 ± 0.5, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: LAD in the presence of LBBB is a predictor of poor outcome after CRT. Patients with LBBB and LAD have more scar tissue, hypertrophy and less activation delay.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Electrocardiology
Pages (from-to)147-152
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Research areas

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Heart failure, Left bundle branch block, QRS axis deviation

ID: 59170001