Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Learning effect of isokinetic measurements in healthy subjects, and reliability and comparability of Biodex and Lido dynamometers

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Cardiorespiratory responses to high intensity skeletal muscle metaboreflex activation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Prognostic impact of ventilation-perfusion defects and pulmonary diffusing capacity after single lung transplantation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Neuro-SPECT: On the development and function of brain emission tomography in the Copenhagen area

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Prognostic factors for work disability in patients with chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia: protocol for a cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Serum urate as a proposed surrogate outcome measure in gout trials: From the OMERACT working group

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. The evolution of instrument selection for inclusion in core outcome sets at OMERACT: Filter 2.2

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

The aim of this study was to examine the learning effect during a set of isokinetic measurements, to evaluate the reliability of the Biodex System 3 PRO dynamometer, and to compare the Biodex System 3 PRO and the Lido Active dynamometers on both extension and flexion over the elbow and the knee at 60 degrees s(-1). Thirteen (nine women, four men) healthy participants were measured five times using the Biodex and once using the Lido dynamometer. The intervals between the first four tests were 20 min, and 1 week between tests 4 and 5. Between Biodex and Lido measurements there was a 20 min time interval. When comparing the first five measurements (Biodex), no systematic effect over time and an excellent reliability were found with respect to elbow and knee flexion and extension. No difference in muscle strength (Nm) between the Biodex and Lido was observed for knee flexion (P = 0.59), knee extension (P = 0.18) and elbow extension (P = 0.63). However, elbow flexion showed a 14.8% (95% CI: 11.2-18.4%; P = 0.0001) higher peak torque on Biodex. In conclusion, no learning effect was observed and the Biodex proved to be a highly reliable isokinetic dynamometer. A difference was observed when comparing Biodex and Lido on elbow flexion, but the difference did not outrange the expected variation found with a typical isokinetic measurement, which is why both sets of equipment seem applicable in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
Volume25
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)75-82
Number of pages8
ISSN1475-0961
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2005

    Research areas

  • Adolescent, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Conditioning (Psychology), Elbow Joint, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Knee Joint, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Torque

ID: 46406292