Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Laparoscopic Repair of Primary Inguinal Hernia Performed in Public Hospitals or Low-Volume Centers Have Increased Risk of Reoperation for Recurrence

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Absorbable Meshes in Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. A Comparative Study of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. High-Throughput Sequencing-Based Investigation of Viruses in Human Cancers by Multienrichment Approach

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Adverse reactions of dimethyl sulfoxide in humans: a systematic review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. A national center for persistent severe pain after groin hernia repair: Five-year prospective data

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Response to Comment on "Polypropylene Mesh and Fertility"

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Groin hernia in children

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is traditionally carried out as either open or laparoscopic repair. Laparoscopic repair has been shown to be superior in terms of pain and discomfort, but has a higher risk of reoperation. Quality of inguinal hernia repair is related to factors such as method of repair, characteristics of patients, and possibly the annual volume of procedures performed by a center. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that hospital volume and type of hospital (private vs public) could influence the reoperation rate for recurrence as a marker of surgical quality of care.

METHODS: This study was based on data from the Danish Hernia Database covering the period from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2013. Hernia repairs included in this study were laparoscopic repair of primary, inguinal hernias in the elective setting, performed on adult male patients.

RESULTS: A total of 14 532 laparoscopic repairs were included for analysis. Centers reporting less than 50 procedures a year had a significantly higher cumulative reoperation rate compared with centers reporting more than 50 procedures a year (9.97% vs 6.06%), P < .0001. Private centers had a lower cumulative reoperation rate compared with public centers: 5.36% versus 8.53%, P ≤ .0001. Type of center and center volume were both independent risk factors for reoperation in a Cox regression model.

CONCLUSION: Hospital volume had an effect on the reoperation rate for recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Furthermore, private centers performed better than public centers irrespective of volume.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSurgical Innovation
Volume23
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)142-7
Number of pages6
ISSN1553-3506
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016

    Research areas

  • Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Hernia, Inguinal, Hospitals, Public, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Laparoscopy, Male, Middle Aged, Reoperation, Young Adult, Journal Article

ID: 49675561