Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Laminar airflow versus turbulent airflow in simulated total hip arthroplasty: measurements of colony-forming units, particles, and energy consumption

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Collection and Reporting of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Arthroplasty Registries: Multinational Survey and Recommendations

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications following primary total knee arthroplasty: a Danish nationwide cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Drug-related challenges following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. E-vitamin giver nyt håb for den uopslidelige kunstige hofte

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleCommunication

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: The optimal type of ventilation in operating theatres for joint arthroplasty has been debated for decades. Recently, the World Health Organization changed its recommendations based on articles that have since been criticized. The economic and environmental impact of ventilation is also currently an important research topic but has not been well investigated.

AIM: To compare how large, high-volume, laminar airflow (LAF) and turbulent airflow (TAF) ventilation systems perform during standardized simulated total hip arthroplasty (THA), as they pertain to colony-forming units (cfu), particle counts, and energy consumption.

METHODS: Two identical operating theatres were used to perform simulated THA. The only difference was that one was equipped with LAF and the other with TAF. Cfu and particles were collected from key points in the operating theatre, and energy was measured for each simulation. Thirty-two simulations were done in total.

FINDINGS: LAF had significantly reduced cfu and particle count when compared with TAF, at both 100% and 50% air influx. Furthermore, it was shown that lowering the air influx by 50% in LAF did not significantly affect cfu or particles, although reducing the fresh air influx from 100% to 50% significantly lowered the energy consumption. Most simulations in TAF did not meet the cleanroom requirements.

CONCLUSION: Cfu were significantly lower in LAF at both 100% and 50% air influx. It is possible to reduce fresh air influx in LAF operating theatres by 50%, significantly reducing energy consumption, while still maintaining cfu and particle counts below the ISO classification threshold required for THA surgery.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Journal of hospital infection
Volume115
Pages (from-to)117-123
Number of pages7
ISSN0195-6701
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2021

    Research areas

  • Air Microbiology, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Environment, Controlled, Humans, Operating Rooms, Stem Cells, Surgical Wound Infection, Ventilation, Energy consumption, Particle count, Laminar airflow, Turbulent airflow, Total hip arthroplasty

ID: 67448651