Kritisk læsning af kliniske retningslinjer

Jeppe Bennekou Schroll; Britta Tendal Jeppesen; Morten Hylander Møller; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Markus Fally; Stig Brorson

doi:10.61409/V09230579

Kritisk læsning af kliniske retningslinjer

Translated title of the contribution: Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines

Jeppe Bennekou Schroll^*, Britta Tendal Jeppesen, Morten Hylander Møller, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Markus Fally, Stig Brorson

^*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Ten questions to assess to what degree a clinical practice guideline is likely to be trustworthy: 1) Do the authors have conflicts of interests? 2) Is the clinical question relevant? 3) Have relevant stakeholders been involved? 4) Have methods for study selection been described? 5) Is there a link between evidence and recommendations (transparent methods)? 6) Has the certainty of evidence been assessed? 7) Have the methods for reaching recommendations been described? 8) Are the recommendations unambiguous? 9) Are the recommendations relevant in your situation? 10) Is there an implementation strategy?

Translated title of the contribution	Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines
Original language	Danish
Article number	V09230579
Journal	Ugeskrift for Laeger
Volume	186
Issue number	6
ISSN	0041-5782
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.61409/V09230579
Publication status	Published - 5 Feb 2024

Access to Document

10.61409/V09230579

Cite this

@article{689ae95c9a5b47e2b445ea45c236fdfe,

title = "Kritisk l{\ae}sning af kliniske retningslinjer",

abstract = "Ten questions to assess to what degree a clinical practice guideline is likely to be trustworthy: 1) Do the authors have conflicts of interests? 2) Is the clinical question relevant? 3) Have relevant stakeholders been involved? 4) Have methods for study selection been described? 5) Is there a link between evidence and recommendations (transparent methods)? 6) Has the certainty of evidence been assessed? 7) Have the methods for reaching recommendations been described? 8) Are the recommendations unambiguous? 9) Are the recommendations relevant in your situation? 10) Is there an implementation strategy?",

author = "Schroll, \{Jeppe Bennekou\} and Jeppesen, \{Britta Tendal\} and M{\o}ller, \{Morten Hylander\} and J{\o}rgensen, \{Karsten Juhl\} and Markus Fally and Stig Brorson",

note = "Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.",

year = "2024",

month = feb,

day = "5",

doi = "10.61409/V09230579",

language = "Dansk",

volume = "186",

journal = "Ugeskrift for Laeger",

issn = "0041-5782",

publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kritisk læsning af kliniske retningslinjer

AU - Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou

AU - Jeppesen, Britta Tendal

AU - Møller, Morten Hylander

AU - Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl

AU - Fally, Markus

AU - Brorson, Stig

N1 - Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

PY - 2024/2/5

Y1 - 2024/2/5

N2 - Ten questions to assess to what degree a clinical practice guideline is likely to be trustworthy: 1) Do the authors have conflicts of interests? 2) Is the clinical question relevant? 3) Have relevant stakeholders been involved? 4) Have methods for study selection been described? 5) Is there a link between evidence and recommendations (transparent methods)? 6) Has the certainty of evidence been assessed? 7) Have the methods for reaching recommendations been described? 8) Are the recommendations unambiguous? 9) Are the recommendations relevant in your situation? 10) Is there an implementation strategy?

AB - Ten questions to assess to what degree a clinical practice guideline is likely to be trustworthy: 1) Do the authors have conflicts of interests? 2) Is the clinical question relevant? 3) Have relevant stakeholders been involved? 4) Have methods for study selection been described? 5) Is there a link between evidence and recommendations (transparent methods)? 6) Has the certainty of evidence been assessed? 7) Have the methods for reaching recommendations been described? 8) Are the recommendations unambiguous? 9) Are the recommendations relevant in your situation? 10) Is there an implementation strategy?

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85184694811

U2 - 10.61409/V09230579

DO - 10.61409/V09230579

M3 - Review

C2 - 38327203

SN - 0041-5782

VL - 186

JO - Ugeskrift for Laeger

JF - Ugeskrift for Laeger

IS - 6

M1 - V09230579

ER -

Kritisk læsning af kliniske retningslinjer

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this