Is severe carbohydrate restriction necessary for appetite suppression? The ASKED randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: This trial aimed to compare three low-energy diets (LEDs) with different amounts of carbohydrates (CHO) on ketosis and changes in hunger feelings in adults with obesity.

METHODS: A total of 101 adults (51 female) with obesity (BMI, mean [SEM], 34.7 [0.4] kg/m2) were randomized to follow three isocaloric LEDs (1000 kcal/day) for 8 weeks, containing either low, medium, or high CHO (70, 100, and 130 g/day, respectively), and 4 weeks of refeeding and weight stabilization. Body weight (BW) and composition, hunger and other appetite ratings, concentrations of β-hydroxybutyrate (βHB), and appetite-related hormones were measured at baseline and at the end of weeks 8 and 12.

RESULTS: At week 8, weight loss and βHB concentrations were significantly different among groups: Low CHO group versus Medium CHO group (BW: 2.32 [0.95] kg, 95% CI: 0.44 to 4.21, p = 0.016; βHB: -0.40 [0.09] mM, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.09, p < 0.001); Low CHO group versus High CHO group (BW: 2.29 [0.96] kg, 95% CI: 0.39 to 4.19, p = 0.016; βHB: -0.644 [0.10] mM, 95% CI: -0.84 to -0.44, p < 0.001); and Medium CHO group versus High CHO group (BW: -0.03 [0.94] kg, 95% CI: -1.89 to 1.84, p = 0.977; βHB: -0.15 [0.08] mM, 95% CI: -0.30 to 0.002, p = 0.054). No significant differences in hunger were found among groups: Low CHO group versus Medium CHO group (-10.87 [5.92] mm, 95% CI: -0.82 to 22.57, p = 0.068); Low CHO group versus Medium CHO group (7.74 [7.36] mm, 95% CI: -6.77 to 22.26, p = 0.294); and Medium CHO group versus High CHO group (-3.13 [7.48] mm, 95% CI: -17.89 to 11.63, p = 0.676).

CONCLUSIONS: Although the findings of this trial are not definitive, changes in hunger ratings with weight loss did not differ among groups. Additional studies with CHO intake of up to 130 g in 1000-kcal/day LEDs are warranted to replicate these findings.