Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Is it possible to predict low-volume and insignificant prostate cancer by core needle biopsies?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori strains among adults and children in a tertiary referral centre in Lithuania

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. A short history of microbial biofilms and biofilm infections

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Biofilms and host response - helpful or harmful

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. Diagnosis of biofilm infections in cystic fibrosis patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Elevated miR-615-3p Expression Predicts Adverse Clinical Outcome and Promotes Proliferation and Migration of Prostate Cancer Cells

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Palliative Prostate Artery Embolization for Prostate Cancer: A Case Series

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Predictive value of AZGP1 following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a cohort study and meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Prognostic factors for relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular cancer: Protocol for a Danish nationwide cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations
In an attempt to minimize overtreatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa) active surveillance (AS) and minor invasive procedures have received increased attention. We investigated the accuracy of pre-operative findings in defining insignificant disease and distinguishing between unilateral/unifocal and bilateral/multifocal PCa. One-hundred and sixty patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were included. Histology reports from the biopsies and matching prostatectomies were compared. Three definitions of insignificant cancer were used: InsigE: tumour volume ≤0.5 mL; InsigW: tumour volume ≤1.3 mL; InsigM: tumour ≤5% of total prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤10 ng/mL. In all definitions, Gleason score (GS) was ≤6 and the tumour was organ confined. Biopsies alone performed poorly as a predictor of unifocal and unilateral cancer in the prostatectomy specimens with positive predictive values of 17.8% and 18.9% respectively. Inclusion of other clinical and biochemical parameters did not significantly increase the predictive value. However, the combination of GS ≤ 6, PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL and unifocal or unilateral cancer in biopsy cores resulted in a positive predictive value of 61.1%, 38.9% and 12.0%, respectively, for identifying InsigM, InsigW and InsigE in the prostate specimen. Conclusively, routine prostate biopsies cannot predict unifocal and unilateral PCa, and must be regarded insufficient to select patients for focal therapy. Although candidates for AS may be identified using standard biopsies, a considerable fraction of patients will be understaged. There is a need for more precise diagnostic tools to assess intraprostatic tumour growth.
Original languageEnglish
JournalA P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica
Volume121
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)257-65
Number of pages9
ISSN0903-4641
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

ID: 38284170