Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

International classification of abdominal wall planes (ICAP) to describe mesh insertion for ventral hernia repair

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Delaying surgery for patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

  2. Perioperative care guidelines: conflicts and controversies

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  3. Differential recurrence after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: importance of a nationwide registry-based mesh surveillance

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Response to: Meticulous surgical technique cannot be replaced by cholangiography

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

  1. Antibiotics during childhood and development of appendicitis-a nationwide cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Incisional hernia repair in women of childbearing age: A nationwide propensity-score matched study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • S G Parker
  • S Halligan
  • M K Liang
  • F E Muysoms
  • G L Adrales
  • A Boutall
  • A C de Beaux
  • U A Dietz
  • C M Divino
  • M T Hawn
  • T B Heniford
  • J P Hong
  • N Ibrahim
  • K M F Itani
  • L N Jorgensen
  • A Montgomery
  • S Morales-Conde
  • Y Renard
  • D L Sanders
  • N J Smart
  • J J Torkington
  • A C J Windsor
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Nomenclature for mesh insertion during ventral hernia repair is inconsistent and confusing. Several terms, including 'inlay', 'sublay' and 'underlay', can refer to the same anatomical planes in the indexed literature. This frustrates comparisons of surgical practice and may invalidate meta-analyses comparing surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to establish an international classification of abdominal wall planes.

METHODS: A Delphi study was conducted involving 20 internationally recognized abdominal wall surgeons. Different terms describing anterior abdominal wall planes were identified via literature review and expert consensus. The initial list comprised 59 possible terms. Panellists completed a questionnaire that suggested a list of options for individual abdominal wall planes. Consensus on a term was predefined as occurring if selected by at least 80 per cent of panellists. Terms scoring less than 20 per cent were removed.

RESULTS: Voting started August 2018 and was completed by January 2019. In round 1, 43 terms (73 per cent) were selected by less than 20 per cent of panellists and 37 new terms were suggested, leaving 53 terms for round 2. Four planes reached consensus in round 2, with the terms 'onlay', 'inlay', 'preperitoneal' and 'intraperitoneal'. Thirty-five terms (66 per cent) were selected by less than 20 per cent of panellists and were removed. After round 3, consensus was achieved for 'anterectus', 'interoblique', 'retro-oblique' and 'retromuscular'. Default consensus was achieved for the 'retrorectus' and 'transversalis fascial' planes.

CONCLUSION: Consensus concerning abdominal wall planes was agreed by 20 internationally recognized surgeons. Adoption should improve communication and comparison among surgeons and research studies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe British journal of surgery
Volume107
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)209-217
Number of pages9
ISSN0007-1323
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

    Research areas

  • Abdominal Wall/surgery, Consensus, Hernia, Ventral/surgery, Herniorrhaphy/methods, Humans, Prostheses and Implants/classification, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Surgical Mesh/classification

ID: 62416340