Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Interhospital Transport of Pediatric Patients in Denmark: A Survey of Current Practice

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Altered brown fat thermoregulation and enhanced cold-induced thermogenesis in young, healthy, winter-swimming men

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Aerosol generation by respiratory support of neonates may be low

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  3. European consensus recommendations for neonatal and paediatric retrievals of positive or suspected COVID-19 patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. Fatal case of hospital-acquired hypernatraemia in a neonate: lessons learned from a tragic error

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Danish premature birth rates during the COVID-19 lockdown

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: No national guidelines exist in Denmark regarding interhospital transport of critically ill children. The aim of this study was to disclose which physicians actually accompany critically ill children during interhospital transports nationwide and whether the physicians have adequate clinical skills to perform interhospital transfers.

METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to the youngest pediatrician on-call at every hospital in Denmark receiving pediatric emergencies except the tertiary Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet.

RESULTS: Seventeen pediatric departments were contacted (response rate, 100%). All departments indicated that they perform interhospital transport of pediatric patients. When presented with 5 cases, great heterogeneity in the choice of transport physician and accompanying staff was seen. With increasing severity, fewer pediatricians were willing to transport the children (24% vs 6%). Irrespective of the degree of severity, more transports were delegated to anesthesiologists than performed by pediatricians. Pediatricians who agreed to transport the infant and neonate had adequate competencies. In cases with older children, 0 to 75% of physicians who would do the transport had adequate clinical skills and experience in emergency pediatric respiratory and cardiovascular management. Training in interhospital transport was offered by 1 department; 6 departments (35%) had local guidelines describing the management of pediatric transports.

CONCLUSIONS: Great heterogeneity was found in the local transport strategies and practical skill sets of accompanying physicians. Overall, there is room for improvement in the management of interhospital transport of critically ill children in Denmark, perhaps by increasing the availability of specialized pediatric transport services for critically ill children nationwide.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPediatric Emergency Care
Volume36
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)389-392
Number of pages4
ISSN0749-5161
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

ID: 56153789