Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
E-pub ahead of print

Increased use of coercive procedures and prolonged hospitalization in compulsory admitted psychotic patients, who refuse antipsychotic medication

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Automatically generated smartphone data and subjective stress in healthy individuals - a pilot study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Help-seeking behavior among Danish veterans with self-reported mental problems - a 22 years register-based follow-up study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Validation of the Danish version of the brief negative symptom scale

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Construct validity of the Mechanical Restraint - Confounders, Risk, Alliance Score (MR-CRAS): a new risk assessment instrument

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Objective: Current Danish legislation imposes that compulsory admitted psychotic patients have the right to refuse antipsychotic medication, which markedly delays pertinent medical treatment.Material and methods: In a retrospective, observational cohort study, we analyzed data from a 1-year period on 34 consecutively admitted patients with schizophrenia, who had been compulsory admitted due to need of treatment, or because they were judged to constitute an acute danger to themselves or others. We compared the use of other coercive procedures and hospitalization time.Results: Twenty-three patients accepted to commence antipsychotic treatment immediately, and 11 patients submitted an official complaint, which significantly delayed initiation of antipsychotic treatment (1 day ±0.9 versus 14 days ±10.1, p = 0.002). The 11 complaining patients were subjected to 6.8 times more coercive procedures of forced sedative medication compared to the 23 patients without delay (2.7 ± 2.3 episodes versus 0.4 ± 0.7 episodes, p = 0.007). Moreover, the treatment-delay prolonged duration of hospitalization by a factor 2.3 (73.3 ± 28.3 days versus 31.7 ± 22.0 days, p < 0.001).Conclusion: The current legislation intends to preserve patient rights and promote voluntary treatment alliance but may instead lead to prolonged hospitalization and increased use of other coercive measures such as forced sedative medication. Modification of current legislation may therefore be considered.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNordic Journal of Psychiatry
Pages (from-to)1-4
Number of pages4
ISSN0803-9488
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Jan 2020

ID: 59086469