Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between ICSI and chromosome abnormalities

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Parenthood among men diagnosed with cancer in childhood and early adulthood: trends over time in a Danish national cohort

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Meditation and mindfulness reduce perceived stress in women with recurrent pregnancy loss: a randomized controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. HLA-DRB1 polymorphism in recurrent pregnancy loss: New evidence for an association to HLA-DRB1*07

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Stress and depression among women and men who have experienced recurrent pregnancy loss: focusing on both sexes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Introduction Over the last decades, the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has increased, even among patients without male factor infertility. The increase has happened even though there is no evidence to support that ICSI results in higher live birth rates compared with conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in cases with nonmale factor infertility. The lack of robust evidence on an advantage of using ICSI over conventional IVF in these patients is problematic since ICSI is more invasive, complex and requires additional resources, time and effort. Therefore, the primary objective of the IVF versus ICSI (INVICSI) study is to determine whether ICSI is superior to standard IVF in patients without severe male factor infertility. The primary outcome measure is first live birth from fresh and frozen-thawed transfers after one stimulated cycle. Secondary outcomes include fertilisation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, birth weight and congenital anomalies. Methods and analysis This is a two-armed, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. In total, 824 couples/women with infertility without severe male factor will be recruited and allocated randomly into two groups (IVF or ICSI) in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will be randomised in variable block sizes and stratified by trial site and age. The main inclusion criteria are (1) no prior IVF/ICSI treatment, (2) male partner sperm with an expected count of minimum 2 million progressive motile spermatozoa following density gradient purification on the day of oocyte pick up and (3) age of the woman between 18 and 42 years. Ethics and dissemination The study will be performed in accordance with the ethical principles in the Helsinki Declaration. The study is approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark. Study findings will be presented, irrespectively of results at international conferences and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. Pre-results.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere051058
JournalBMJ Open
Volume11
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
ISSN2044-6055
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jun 2021

    Research areas

  • Adolescent, Adult, Birth Rate, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Male/therapy, Male, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Rate, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic, Young Adult, male infertility, sexual medicine, subfertility, reproductive medicine

ID: 66508023