Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Improving quantitative dosimetry in (177)Lu-DOTATATE SPECT by energy window-based scatter corrections

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  1. Assessment of Liver Fat: Dual-Energy CT versus Conventional CT with and without Contrast

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  2. EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  3. Ethics in extracorporeal life support: a narrative review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: Patient-specific dosimetry of lutetium-177 ((177)Lu)-DOTATATE treatment in neuroendocrine tumours is important, because uptake differs across patients. Single photon emission computer tomography (SPECT)-based dosimetry requires a conversion factor between the obtained counts and the activity, which depends on the collimator type, the utilized energy windows and the applied scatter correction techniques. In this study, energy window subtraction-based scatter correction methods are compared experimentally and quantitatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: (177)Lu SPECT images of a phantom with known activity concentration ratio between the uniform background and filled hollow spheres were acquired for three different collimators: low-energy high resolution (LEHR), low-energy general purpose (LEGP) and medium-energy general purpose (MEGP). Counts were collected in several energy windows, and scatter correction was performed by applying different methods such as effective scatter source estimation (ESSE), triple-energy and dual-energy window, double-photopeak window and downscatter correction. The intensity ratio between the spheres and the background was measured and corrected for the partial volume effect and used to compare the performance of the methods.

RESULTS: Low-energy collimators combined with 208 keV energy windows give rise to artefacts. For the 113 keV energy window, large differences were observed in the ratios for the spheres. For MEGP collimators with the ESSE correction technique, the measured ratio was close to the real ratio, and the differences between spheres were small.

CONCLUSION: For quantitative (177)Lu imaging MEGP collimators are advised. Both energy peaks can be utilized when the ESSE correction technique is applied. The difference between the calculated and the real ratio is less than 10% for both energy windows.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNuclear Medicine Communications
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)522-533
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

    Research areas

  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Octreotide, Organometallic Compounds, Phantoms, Imaging, Radiometry, Scattering, Radiation, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

ID: 45001569