Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Implementing volunteer peer mentoring as a supplement to professional efforts in primary rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Exploring the contextual transition from spinal cord injury rehabilitation to the home environment: a qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Evaluation of a re-engineered device for penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The test-retest reliability of individualized VO2peak test modalities in people with spinal cord injury undergoing rehabilitation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Exploring the contextual transition from spinal cord injury rehabilitation to the home environment: a qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The test-retest reliability of individualized VO2peak test modalities in people with spinal cord injury undergoing rehabilitation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY: A DANISH NATIONWIDE REGISTER-BASED STUDY

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. A review of sleep research in patients with spinal cord injury

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

View graph of relations

STUDY DESIGN: A feasibility study, supplemented by a noncontrolled pretest/posttest.

OBJECTIVES: To examine if a nationwide volunteer peer-mentoring program for in-patients with acute/subacute spinal cord injury is feasible and achievable.

SETTING: The Spinal Cord Injury Center of Western Denmark and Clinic for Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

METHODS: Volunteer mentor groups were formed similarly in two highly specialized SCI centers covering Denmark. Hospital staff was responsible for referral to the mentoring project and for the interdisciplinary evaluation of patient eligibility. At each of the two centers, a person living with the consequences of SCI coordinated the intervention in collaboration with healthcare personnel. Designated project personnel introduced eligible participants to the project. Staff at the SCI centers arranged to fit in the supplementary mentoring with ongoing treatment. A self-report questionnaire was completed prior to and after peer intervention.

OUTCOME: patient reports regarding mentoring sessions, change in quality of life (QoL), depression items from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), pain frequency and intensity (11-point Numerical Rating Scale).

RESULTS: A nationwide mentor corps was established. Fifty-two eligible in-patients completed the study. Significant improvement in QoL was found after mentoring. Frequency and intensity of pain did not change, although five out of nine depression items improved significantly. A majority (94%) of the participants recommended others to meet with a peer mentor.

CONCLUSIONS: Establishing a nationwide volunteer mentor system at a highly specialized neuro-rehabilitation units for SCI in-patients is both feasible and acceptable.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSpinal Cord
Volume57
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)881-889
Number of pages9
ISSN1362-4393
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

ID: 58403473