Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Impact of feedback and monitoring on colonoscopy withdrawal times and polyp detection rates

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Putative biomarkers of vedolizumab resistance and underlying inflammatory pathways involved in IBD

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Managing vitamin D deficiency in inflammatory bowel disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Metabonomics in Gastroenterology and Hepatology

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Fluorescence-based tracing of transplanted intestinal epithelial cells using confocal laser endomicroscopy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Methotrexate for inflammatory bowel disease: time for reconsideration

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown colonoscopy withdrawal time (WT) to be a reliable surrogate indicator for polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. Our aim was to assess the impact of feedback and monitoring of WT on PDR in routine colonoscopies with long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 307 colonoscopies were performed in three separate clinical scenarios. First, PDR and WT were recorded without the staff being aware of the specific objective of the study. Before the second scenario, the staff was given interventional information and feedback on WTs and PDRs from the first scenario and was encouraged to aim for a minimum WT of 8 min. Retention of knowledge gained was reassessed in the third scenario 1 year later.

RESULTS: The PDR in the first two scenarios differed significantly (p<0.01), with a more than 90% increase in PDR after intervention from 22% to 42% (95% CI 1.44 to 4.95), although the mean WT did not change (6.8 vs 7.2 min; p>0.05). The increase in PDR between the first and second scenarios was retained in the third follow-up scenario 1 year later where the WT of both polyp-positive and polyp-negative colonoscopies was found to be longer.

CONCLUSIONS: PDR almost doubled from the first to the second scenario of a real-life colonoscopy setting, indicating that awareness of WT is crucial. The knowledge gained from this intervention in routine practice was even retained after a year.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Open Gastroenterology
Volume4
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)e000142
ISSN2054-4774
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

ID: 59003480