Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Impact of caller's degree-of-worry on triage response in out-of-hours telephone consultations: a randomized controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Patient experience of spinal immobilisation after trauma

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Availability of suPAR in emergency departments may improve risk stratification: a secondary analysis of the TRIAGE III trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Medical dispatchers' perception of visual information in real out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a qualitative interview study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Pre-hospital management of acute stroke patients eligible for thrombolysis - an evaluation of ambulance on-scene time

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Traumatic brain injury is associated with increased syndecan-1 shedding in severely injured patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Telephone triage entails assessment of urgency and direction of flow in out-of-hours (OOH) services, while visual cues are inherently lacking. Triage tools are recommended but current tools fail to provide systematic assessment of the caller's perspective. Research demonstrated that callers can scale their degree-of-worry (DOW) in a telephone contact with OOH services, but its impact on triage response is undetermined. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between call-handlers' awareness of the caller's DOW and the telephone triage response.

METHODS: A randomized controlled trial at a Danish OOH service using telephone triage with quantitative analyses and qualitative process evaluation. Prior to contact with a call-handler, callers were asked to rate their DOW on a five-point scale. Calls were randomized to show or not show DOW on the call-handlers' screens. Triage response (telephone consultation or face-to-face consultation) was analysed using Chi-square tests. Process evaluation incorporated a quantitative and qualitative assessment of intervention implementation and fidelity.

RESULTS: Of 11,413 calls, 5705 were allocated to the intervention and 5708 to the control group. No difference in number of face-to-face consultations was detected between the two groups (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.14, p = 0.17). The process evaluation showed that call-handlers did not use the DOW systematically and were reluctant to use DOW.

CONCLUSION: Awareness of DOW did not affect the triage response, but this finding could reflect a weak implementation strategy. Future studies should emphasise the implementation strategy to determine the effect of DOW on triage response.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number, Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02979457 .

Original languageEnglish
Article number44
JournalScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Volume27
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)44
ISSN1757-7241
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Apr 2019

    Research areas

  • Out of hours medical care, Randomized controlled trial, Triage

ID: 56982858