Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension

Dorothea Wendt, Torsten Dau, Jens Hjortkjær

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Speech comprehension in adverse listening conditions can be effortful even when speech is fully intelligible. Acoustical distortions typically make speech comprehension more effortful, but effort also depends on linguistic aspects of the speech signal, such as its syntactic complexity. In the present study, pupil dilations, and subjective effort ratings were recorded in 20 normal-hearing participants while performing a sentence comprehension task. The sentences were either syntactically simple (subject-first sentence structure) or complex (object-first sentence structure) and were presented in two levels of background noise both corresponding to high intelligibility. A digit span and a reading span test were used to assess individual differences in the participants' working memory capacity (WMC). The results showed that the subjectively rated effort was mostly affected by the noise level and less by syntactic complexity. Conversely, pupil dilations increased with syntactic complexity but only showed a small effect of the noise level. Participants with higher WMC showed increased pupil responses in the higher-level noise condition but rated sentence comprehension as being less effortful compared to participants with lower WMC. Overall, the results demonstrate that pupil dilations and subjectively rated effort represent different aspects of effort. Furthermore, the results indicate that effort can vary in situations with high speech intelligibility.

Original languageEnglish
Article number345
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume7
Issue numberMAR
ISSN1664-1078
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this