Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Identifying a subpopulation with higher likelihoods of early response to treatment in a heterogeneous rare disease: a post hoc study of response to teduglutide for short bowel syndrome

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. New-onset of postoperative atrial fibrillation is likely to recur in the absence of other triggers

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Eliminating the need for fasting with oral administration of bisphosphonates

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Colon polyps in patients with short bowel syndrome before and after teduglutide: Post hoc analysis of the STEPS study series

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Enteral Autonomy and Days Off Parenteral Support With Teduglutide Treatment for Short Bowel Syndrome in the STEPS Trials

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Repeated Metabolic Balance Studies in Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Impact of Teduglutide on Quality of Life Among Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome and Intestinal Failure

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Purpose: Teduglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-2 analog, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing parenteral support (PS) among patients with short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure (SBS-IF). This study aims to identify a subpopulation of SBS-IF patients for whom teduglutide has an especially pronounced effect.

Patients and methods: Data were from a 24-week, Phase III trial (Study of Teduglutide Effectiveness in Parenteral Nutrition-Dependent SBS Subjects; NCT00798967) that randomized SBS-IF patients with PS dependency to receive teduglutide (n=43) or placebo (n=43). Two prediction models (1 for each arm) were developed for response, defined as 20% reduction in weekly PS at Weeks 20 and 24. Potential predictors included demographics, disease characteristics, and concomitant medications. Patients were then ranked based on the effect score, an individualized predicted response rate difference with teduglutide versus placebo. A subpopulation of patients with a pronounced benefit from teduglutide versus placebo was identified. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between patients included versus those not included in the subpopulation.

Results: Six predictors of response to teduglutide were selected: older age, volvulus as the cause of major intestinal resection, baseline PS volume >6 L per week, longer time since start of PS dependency, absence of ileocecal valve, and lower percentage of colon remaining. Higher percentage of colon remaining and volvulus were the selected predictors for response to placebo. A subpopulation of patients more likely to respond to teduglutide was identified as those with the top 60% effect scores. The difference in response rate between teduglutide and placebo was 62% in the subpopulation, which was substantially higher than the difference of 33% in the overall population. Mean PS day reduction was also significantly higher for teduglutide compared to placebo in the subpopulation.

Conclusion: Pretreatment characteristics as predictors of response to teduglutide versus placebo within 24 weeks were identifiable in the clinical trial population of SBS-IF patients.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTherapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Volume14
Pages (from-to)1267-1277
Number of pages11
ISSN1176-6336
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

ID: 56502956