TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of Risk Markers for Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study with Focus on Quality Assurance Based on Real World Data30
AU - Laustsen, Christoffer
AU - Rungby, Jørgen
AU - Christensen, Erik
AU - Christrup, L
AU - Jensen, Nanna Martin
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Introduction: Poor glycemic regulation in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) significantly increases the risk of complications.
Therefore, we determined the prevalence of poorly controlled T2DM at a large inner-city out-patient clinic in Denmark and identified
risk markers for poorly controlled T2DM.
Methods: Data were collected retrospectively on all diabetes patients attending at the out-patient clinic in 2016. Patients attending
at the clinic > 2 yrs were categorized by HbA1c as tightly controlled (≤ 50 mmol/mol/ 6.7 %; n=46) or poorly controlled (≥ 75 mmol/
mol/ 9.0 %; n=108) and compared across 55 variables.
Results: 313 out of 1202 (26 %) were poorly controlled T2DM patients. Poorly controlled patients had longer duration of diabetes
(10.0 vs. 8.5 yrs), higher LDL values (2.34 vs. 1.86 mmol/L), higher triglyceride levels (2.15 vs. 1.63 mmol/L), received more diabetes
drugs (3 vs. 2), had more insulin prescribed (85% vs. 52 %), more retinopathy (51% vs. 20%), more comorbidities (2 vs. 1), higher
Charlson comorbidity index (4 vs. 3), more yearly consultations (4 vs. 3), and more often another anticipated place of origin than
Denmark (57 % vs. 24 %) compared to tightly controlled patients.
Conclusion: Risk markers for poorly controlled T2DM were a more pronounced metabolic syndrome and anticipated place of
origin, and not clinical inertia, patient attendance at the outpatient clinic nor compliance to medication.
AB - Introduction: Poor glycemic regulation in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) significantly increases the risk of complications.
Therefore, we determined the prevalence of poorly controlled T2DM at a large inner-city out-patient clinic in Denmark and identified
risk markers for poorly controlled T2DM.
Methods: Data were collected retrospectively on all diabetes patients attending at the out-patient clinic in 2016. Patients attending
at the clinic > 2 yrs were categorized by HbA1c as tightly controlled (≤ 50 mmol/mol/ 6.7 %; n=46) or poorly controlled (≥ 75 mmol/
mol/ 9.0 %; n=108) and compared across 55 variables.
Results: 313 out of 1202 (26 %) were poorly controlled T2DM patients. Poorly controlled patients had longer duration of diabetes
(10.0 vs. 8.5 yrs), higher LDL values (2.34 vs. 1.86 mmol/L), higher triglyceride levels (2.15 vs. 1.63 mmol/L), received more diabetes
drugs (3 vs. 2), had more insulin prescribed (85% vs. 52 %), more retinopathy (51% vs. 20%), more comorbidities (2 vs. 1), higher
Charlson comorbidity index (4 vs. 3), more yearly consultations (4 vs. 3), and more often another anticipated place of origin than
Denmark (57 % vs. 24 %) compared to tightly controlled patients.
Conclusion: Risk markers for poorly controlled T2DM were a more pronounced metabolic syndrome and anticipated place of
origin, and not clinical inertia, patient attendance at the outpatient clinic nor compliance to medication.
M3 - Journal article
VL - 2
SP - 30
EP - 36
JO - Journal of Diabetes and Clinical Research
JF - Journal of Diabetes and Clinical Research
SN - 2689-2839
IS - 2
ER -