Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Anastomotic complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Robotic versus laparoscopic urological surgery: incidence of reoperation and complications

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Successful extraction of sperm cells after autologous bone marrow transplant: a case report

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The prognostic impact of incidental prostate cancer following radical cystoprostatectomy: a nationwide analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. National incidence and survival of patients with non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma: a Danish population study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Implantation of the argus sling in a hard-to-treat patient group with urinary stress incontinence

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Community-based football in men with prostate cancer: 1-year follow-up on a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Palliative Prostate Artery Embolization for Prostate Cancer: A Case Series

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Predictive value of AZGP1 following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a cohort study and meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Active Surveillance Versus Radical Prostatectomy in Favorable-risk Localized Prostate Cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Objective Anastomotic complications are well known after radical prostatectomy (RP). The vesicourethral anastomotic technique is handled differently between open and robotic RP. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the frequency of anastomotic leakages and strictures differed between patients undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to identify risk factors associated with these complications. Materials and methods The study included 735 consecutive patients who underwent RRP (n = 499) or RARP (236) at the Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, in a complete 3 year period from 2010 to 2012. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyse associations between surgical procedure (RRP vs RARP) and anastomotic complications. Analyses included age, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, surgeon, prostate volume and anastomotic leakage as variables. Owing to a low number of events, multivariable analyses only included smoking status, diabetes and prostate volume for anastomotic leakage, and age, smoking status, prostate volume and anastomotic leakage for anastomotic strictures. Results The frequency of anastomotic leakage was 2.9%. Anastomotic stricture was seen in 4.9% of patients during follow-up. No differences were found in the frequency of anastomotic leakage (p = 0.35) or strictures (p = 0.35) between RRP and RARP. Univariate analysis demonstrated an association between surgeon and the risk of anastomotic strictures in RRP patients (p = 0.02). No other independent risk factors were identified. Conclusion Overall, the anastomotic complication rate in this cohort is similar to other published reports. No obvious risk factors for anastomotic complications could be identified, which in part was due to the low number of events.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Volume50
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)274-9
Number of pages6
ISSN0036-5599
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

ID: 46337761