Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Carpal tunnel release: a randomized comparison of three surgical methods

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Elektra prosthesis for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a follow-up of 39 consecutive cases

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Low-profile plate fixation in arthrodesis of the first metacarpophalangeal joint

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Is one-stop surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome safe? A retrospective long-term follow-up study in a neurosurgical unit in Copenhagen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Sensation, mechanoreceptor, and nerve fiber function after nerve regeneration

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Remodeling of motor units after nerve regeneration studied by quantitative electromyography

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Collateral ligament reconstruction of the chronic thumb injury with bio-tenodesis screw fixation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Wear particles and osteolysis in patients with total wrist arthroplasty

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations
A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial was done to compare the results of carpal tunnel release using classic incision, short incision, or endoscopic technique. In total, 90 consecutive cases were included. Follow-up was 24 weeks. We found a significantly shorter sick leave in the endoscopic group. No significant differences in pain, paraesthesiae, range of motion, pillar pain, and grip strength could be found at 24 weeks of follow-up, although intermediate significant differences were seen, especially in grip strength, in favour of endoscopic technique. No major advantage to using a short incision could be found. There were no serious complications in either group. The results indicate that the endoscopic procedure is safe and has the benefit of faster rehabilitation and return to work.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Journal of hand surgery, European volume
Volume38
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)646-50
Number of pages5
ISSN1753-1934
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

ID: 42258534