Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Oxygen supplementation for critically ill patients-A protocol for a systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Inadequate emergence after non-cardiac surgery-A prospective observational study in 1000 patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Time to onset of gastrointestinal bleeding in the SUP-ICU trial: a preplanned substudy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Use of red blood cells in Danish intensive care units: A population-based register study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Heterogeneity of treatment effect of stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients: A secondary analysis protocol

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Pantoprazole in ICU patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding-1-year mortality in the SUP-ICU trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients, hypoxaemia is a common clinical manifestation of inadequate gas exchange in the lungs. Supplemental oxygen is therefore given to all critically ill patients. This can result in hyperoxaemia, and some observational studies have identified harms with hyperoxia. The objective of this systematic review is to critically assess the evidence of randomised clinical trials on the effects of higher versus lower inspiratory oxygen fractions or targets of arterial oxygenation in critically ill adult patients.

METHODS: We will search for randomised clinical trials in major international databases. Two authors will independently screen and select references for inclusion using Covidence, extract data and assess the methodological quality of the included randomised clinical trials using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Any disagreement will be resolved by consensus. We will analyse the extracted data using Review Manager and Trial Sequential Analysis. To assess the quality of the evidence, we will create a 'Summary of Findings' table containing our primary and secondary outcomes using the GRADE assessment.

DISCUSSION: Supplemental oxygen administration is widely recommended in international guidelines despite lack of robust evidence of its effectiveness. To our knowledge, no systematic review of randomised clinical trials has investigated the effects of oxygen supplementation in critically ill patients. This systematic review will provide reliable evidence to better inform future trialists and decision-makers on clinical practice on supplemental oxygen administration in critically ill patients.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume62
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)1020-1030
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • Journal Article, Review

ID: 53749354