Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

How participatory action research changed our view of the challenges of shared decision-making training

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Online communication in a rehabilitation setting: Experiences of patients with chronic conditions using a web portal in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Is diabetes self-management education still the Cinderella of diabetes care?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Patientś experiences of patient education on psychiatric inpatient wards; a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Internet-based therapy with FearFighter for anxiety disorders: a randomised clinical trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Kommunikationstræning nytænkes på Sygehus Lillebælt

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleCommunication

  3. Social anxiety disorder and avoidant personality disorder from an interpersonal perspective

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Jette Ammentorp
  • Maiken Wolderslund
  • Connie Timmermann
  • Henry Larsen
  • Karina Dahl Steffensen
  • Annegrethe Nielsen
  • Marianne E Lau
  • Bodil Winther
  • Lars Henrik Jensen
  • Elisabeth Assing Hvidt
  • Niels Christian Hvidt
  • Pål Gulbrandsen
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to demonstrate how the use of participatory action research (PAR) helped us identify ways to respond to communication challenges associated with shared decision-making (SDM) training.

METHODS: Patients, relatives, researchers, and health professionals were involved in a PAR process that included: (1) two theatre workshops, (2) a pilot study of an SDM training module involving questionnaires and evaluation meetings, and (3) three reflection workshops.

RESULTS: The PAR process revealed that health professionals often struggled with addressing existential issues such as concerns about life, relationships, meaning, and ability to lead responsive dialogue. Following the PAR process, a communication programme that included communication on existential issues and coaching was drafted.

CONCLUSION: By involving multiple stakeholders in a comprehensive PAR process, valuable communication skills addressing a broader understanding of SDM were identified. A communication programme aimed to enhance skills in a mindful and responsive clinical dialogue on the expectations, values, and hopes of patients and their relatives was drafted.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Before integrating new communication concepts such as SDM in communication training, research methods such as PAR can be used to improve understanding and identify the needs and priorities of both patients and health professionals.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume101
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)639-646
ISSN0738-3991
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 52686001