Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

How does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

  1. Gastrointestinal mean transit times in young and middle-aged healthy subjects.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

  2. Forearm metabolism during infusion of adrenaline: comparison of the dominant and non-dominant arm

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Simplified scintigraphic methods for measuring gastrointestinal transit times.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

  4. Transperitoneal transport in diabetic and non-diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Interstitial lactate levels in human skin at rest and during an oral glucose load: a microdialysis study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • H L Jørgensen
  • L Warming
  • N H Bjarnason
  • P B Andersen
  • C Hassager
View graph of relations
The World Health Organisation (WHO) has proposed a set of guidelines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in adult women based on a measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) expressed as the number of SD below young adult mean (t-score). In this study, we investigated the number of subjects classified as either osteopenic or osteoporotic according to these guidelines using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), at the hip, at the spine and at the lower forearm and quantitative ultrasound (QUS), at the heel. A total of 247 men, 209 postmenopausal women and 195 premenopausal women were included in the study. Furthermore, the study provides the first normative data showing the influence of sex, age and menopause on broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS), as measured by the DTU-one imaging ultrasound scanner. The difference between the number of patients classified into either diagnosis group by the investigated parameters is large ranging from 25.9% of the women being diagnosed as osteopenic by BUA at the heel to 43.0% by BMD at the femoral neck. For men, the same range is from 20.5% by BUA to 44.1% by BMD at the femoral neck. For the classification into the osteoporotic group, the range is from 2.5% by intertrochanteric BMD to 24.4% by BMD at Ward's triangle for women and from 0% by SOS to 29.0% by BMD at Ward's triangle for men. Using total hip BMD as the reference parameter to categorize the subjects as normal, osteopenic or osteoporotic, the agreement of the other parameters with this classification is assessed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. We conclude that there are significant differences in the classification of osteoporosis/osteopenia depending on the site measured and the technique used for the bone mass assessment. Furthermore, we suggest that development of technique and site specific cut-off values may increase the accuracy of the classification of osteoporosis/osteopenia in both men and women.
Translated title of the contributionHow does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories?
Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical physiology (Oxford, England)
Volume21
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)51-59
Number of pages9
ISSN0144-5979
Publication statusPublished - 2001

ID: 32518847