Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Heterogeneity of treatment effect of stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients: A secondary analysis protocol

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Depth to the airway lumen at the level of the cricothyroid membrane measured by ultrasound

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The association between epidural analgesia and mortality in emergency abdominal surgery: A population-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. The association between epidural analgesia and mortality in emergency abdominal surgery: A population-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: In the Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Intensive Care Unit (SUP-ICU) trial, 3291 adult ICU patients at risk for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding were randomly allocated to intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg or placebo once daily in the ICU. No difference was observed between the groups in the primary outcome 90-day mortality or the secondary outcomes, except for clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding. However, heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) not detected by conventional subgroup analyses could be present.

METHODS: This is a protocol and statistical analysis plan for a secondary, post hoc, exploratory analysis of the SUP-ICU trial. We will explore HTE in one set of subgroups based on severity of illness (using the Simplified Acute Physiology Score [SAPS] II) and another set of subgroups based on the total number of risk factors for GI bleeding in each patient using Bayesian hierarchical models. We will summarise posterior probability distributions using medians and 95% credible intervals and present probabilities for different levels of benefit and harm of the intervention in each subgroup. Finally, we will assess if the treatment effect interacts with SAPS II and the number of risk factors separately on the continuous scale using marginal effects plots.

CONCLUSIONS: The outlined post hoc analysis will explore whether HTE was present in the SUP-ICU trial and may help answer some of the remaining questions regarding the balance between benefits and harms of pantoprazole in ICU patients at risk of GI bleeding. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02467621.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume63
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1251-1256
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jul 2019

ID: 57626789