Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Hand hygiene compliance of healthcare workers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A long-term follow-up study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Light-guided nudging and data-driven performance feedback improve hand hygiene compliance among nurses and doctors

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Clinical experiences with a new system for automated hand hygiene monitoring: A prospective observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. A hospital outbreak of an NDM-producing ST167 Escherichia coli with a possible link to a toilet

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  2. Associations between YKL-40 and markers of disease severity and death in patients with necrotizing soft-tissue infection

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Discriminatory plasma biomarkers predict specific clinical phenotypes of necrotizing soft-tissue infections

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. APMIS pandemic editorial

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Information about the long-term effects of hand hygiene (HH) interventions is needed. We aimed to investigate the change in HH compliance (HHC) of healthcare workers (HCWs) once a data-driven feedback intervention was stopped, and to assess if the COVID-19 pandemic influenced the HH behavior.

METHODS: We conducted an observational, extension trial in a surgical department between January 2019-December 2020. Doctors (n = 19) and nurses (n = 53) were included and their HHC was measured using an electronic HH monitoring system (EHHMS). We compared the changes in HHC during 3 phases: (1) Intervention (data presentation meetings), (2) Prepandemic follow-up and (3) Follow-up during COVID-19.

RESULTS: The HHC during phase 1 (intervention), phase 2 (prepandemic follow-up) and phase 3 (follow-up during COVID-19) was 58%, 46%, and 34%, respectively. Comparison analyses revealed that the HHC was significantly lower in the prepandemic follow-up period (46% vs 58%, P < .0001) and in the follow-up period during COVID-19 (34% vs 58%, P < .0001) compared with the intervention period (phase 1).

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the HHC of the HCWs significantly decreased over time once the data presentation meetings from management stopped. This study demonstrates that HCWs fall back into old HH routines once improvement initiatives are stopped.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal Of Infection Control
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)1118-1122
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2021

    Research areas

  • Automated hand-hygiene monitoring, Electronic monitoring systems, Infection prevention and control, Nosocomial, Real-time measurement

ID: 66509006