Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Group supervision for general practitioners: a case study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. The uses and implications of standards in general practice consultations

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. General practitioners uses and perceptions of voluntary electronic feedback on treatment outcomes - a qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Informal work and formal plans: articulating the active role of patients in cancer trajectories

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

AIM: Group supervision is a sparsely researched method for professional development in general practice. The aim of this study was to explore general practitioners' (GPs') experiences of the benefits of group supervision for improving the treatment of mental disorders.

METHODS: One long-established supervision group was studied closely for six months by observing the group sessions, and by interviewing GPs and their supervisors, individually and collectively. The interviews were recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed using systematic text condensation.

RESULTS: The GPs found participation in a supervision group to be a meaningful and professionally valuable activity. They experienced that supervision had improved their psychiatric skills, and that they had become more confident in carrying out talking therapies. Improvements in referral letters were also reported in relation to the communication with local community psychiatry centres. Furthermore, the GPs experienced that supervision had a positive 'spill-over effect' on everyday consultations, and that the supervision group became a forum for coping with other difficulties in their professional life as well. Trust and continuity were considered important prerequisites for disclosing and discussing professional problems.

CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that participation in a supervision group can be beneficial for maintaining and developing GPs' skills in dealing with patients with mental health problems. Group supervision influenced other areas of GPs' professional lives as well. However, more studies are needed to assess the impact of supervision groups.

Original languageEnglish
JournalQuality in Primary Care (Print)
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)17-22
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Research areas

  • Clinical Competence, Communication, Denmark, Family Practice, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Male, Mental Disorders, Middle Aged, Physicians, Family, Psychiatry

ID: 44465161