Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Group authorships in Cochrane had low compliance with Cochrane recommendations

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Increasing number of authors in Cochrane reviews

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Mammography screening in Norway caused substantial overdiagnosis and did not reduce late-stage breast cancers

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  3. Targeting intensive glycaemic control versus targeting conventional glycaemic control for type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  1. Long-term mortality in the Intermediate care after emergency abdominal surgery (InCare) trial - a post-hoc follow-up study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. More than one-third of Cochrane reviews had gift authors, whereas ghost authorship was rare

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than 2 years after the protocol

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: Recently, group authorships have become more common. Group authorship describes a situation where the name of a group of people is included in the byline of an article. Historically, however, group authorships have been associated with citation errors and difficulties identifying who could be regarded as an author. Cochrane is a collaboration that publishes high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses and transparency in authorship should be high. Group authorships in Cochrane have not previously been examined. This study aimed to describe group authorships in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR).

METHODS: In total, 8396 reviews from the CDSR were screened for group authorships from inception to 31 December 2019. Data from group authorships were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS: A total of 41 reviews with group authorships were included. Almost half of group authorships (46%, 19/41) were published from 2015 to 2019. Median number of group members was 32 (range 6-91). Median publication time (protocol to review) of group authorships was 3.1 years. Of all group authorships, 39% met ICMJE's first authorship criterion, 41% met the second, and 12% met the third criterion. For only two studies all authors met the three authorship criteria.

CONCLUSION: A low prevalence of group authorships existed in Cochrane reviews. Reviews with group authorships took median three years to publish, and very few of group authorships in Cochrane complied with the ICMJE authorship criteria.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume13
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)199-205
Number of pages7
ISSN1756-5383
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

ID: 60988356