GRADE pearls and pitfalls-Part 2: Clinical practice guidelines

Anders Granholm*, Zainab Al Duhailib, Waleed Alhazzani, Simon Oczkowski, Emilie Belley-Cote, Morten Hylander Møller

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach is the de facto standard framework for summarising evidence in systematic reviews and developing recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.

METHODS: We describe how the GRADE approach is used in clinical practice guidelines, including key points and examples. The intended audience of this overview of GRADE is clinicians and researchers who are, or plan to be, involved in the development or assessment of clinical practice guidelines.

RESULTS: We cover guideline endorsement and adaptation; guideline panels and sponsors; conflicts of interest; guideline questions and outcome prioritisation; systematic review creation, updating and re-use; rating the overall certainty of evidence; development of recommendations and implications; and peer review, publication, implementation and updating of guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS: This overview aims to help developers, assessors and users of clinical practice guidelines understand how trustworthy, high-quality guidelines are developed using the GRADE approach.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume68
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)593-600
Number of pages8
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • GRADE Approach
  • Humans
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'GRADE pearls and pitfalls-Part 2: Clinical practice guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this