Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Validation studies in epidemiologic research: Estimation of the positive predictive value

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Effect Modifiers and Statistical Tests for Interaction in Randomized Trials

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2: Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Linan Zeng
  • Romina Brignardello-Petersen
  • Monica Hultcrantz
  • Reed A C Siemieniuk
  • Nancy Santesso
  • Gregory Traversy
  • Ariel Izcovich
  • Behnam Sadeghirad
  • Paul E Alexander
  • Tahira Devji
  • Bram Rochwerg
  • Mohammad H Murad
  • Rebecca Morgan
  • Robin Christensen
  • Holger J Schünemann
  • Gordon H Guyatt
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: To provide practical principles and examples to help GRADE users make optimal choices regarding their ratings of certainty of evidence using a minimally or partially contextualized approach.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Based on the GRADE clarification of certainty of evidence in 2017, a project group within the GRADE Working Group conducted iterative discussions and presentations at GRADE Working Group meetings to refine this construct and produce practical guidance.

RESULTS: Systematic review and health technology assessment authors need to clarify what it is in which they are rating their certainty of evidence (i.e., the target of their certainty rating). The decision depends on the degree of contextualization (partially or minimally contextualized), thresholds (null, small, moderate or large effect threshold), and where the point estimate lies in relation to the chosen threshold(s). When the 95% confidence interval crosses multiple possible thresholds (i.e., including both large benefit and large harm), it is not worthwhile for authors to determine the target of certainty rating.

CONCLUSION: GRADE provides practical principles to help systematic review and health technology assessment authors specify the target of their certainty of evidence rating.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume137
Pages (from-to)163-175
Number of pages13
ISSN0895-4356
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2021

    Research areas

  • Evidence-based medicine, GRADE, Health technology assessment, Systematic review, Target of certainty of evidence rating, Thresholds

ID: 65749559