Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

GPs and involuntary admission: a qualitative study

Britta Jepsen, Kirsten Lomborg, Marianne Engberg

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In many countries, medical authorities are responsible for involuntary admissions of mentally ill patients. Nonetheless, very little is known about GPs' experiences with involuntary admission.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to explore GP's experiences from participating in involuntary admissions.

SETTING: General practice, Aarhus, Denmark.

METHOD: One focus group interview and six individual interviews were conducted with 13 Danish GPs, who had recently sectioned one of their own patients.

RESULTS: GPs experienced stress and found the admission procedure time consuming. They felt that sectioning patients was unpleasant, and felt nervous, but experienced relief and professional satisfaction if things went well. The GPs experienced the doctor-patient relationship to be at risk, but also reported that it could be improved. GPs felt that they were not taken seriously by the psychiatric system.

CONCLUSION: The unpleasant experiences and induced feelings resulting from involuntary admissions reflect an undesirable and stressful working environment.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
Volume60
Issue number577
Pages (from-to)604-6
Number of pages3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Commitment of Mentally Ill
  • Denmark
  • Family Practice
  • Humans
  • Mental Disorders
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'GPs and involuntary admission: a qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this