Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Glimpse into the future

Jacob Eifer Moller*, Norman Mangner, Federico Pappalardo, Holger Thiele

*Corresponding author for this work
1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Randomized studies attempting to prove benefit of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock have failed to reduce the risk of death. Further, both registry and randomized data suggest increased rates of serious complications associated with these devices. This last review in the supplement discusses current evidence and provides a perspective on how the scientific community could advance cardiogenic shock research focused on mechanical circulatory support.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology
Volume25
Issue numberSuppl I
Pages (from-to)I44-I48
ISSN1520-765X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Micro-Axial flow pump
  • Percutaneous ventricular assist device
  • Randomized clinical trials

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Glimpse into the future'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this