Abstract
It is not clear whether high-quality coincidence gamma-PET (gPET) cameras can provide clinical data comparable with data obtained with dedicated PET (dPET) cameras in the primary diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected lung cancer. This study focuses on 2 main issues: direct comparison between foci resolved with the 2 different PET scanners and the diagnostic accuracy compared with final diagnosis determined by the combined information from all other investigations and clinical follow-up.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Nuclear Medicine |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 8 |
Pages (from-to) | 1351-7 |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISSN | 0161-5505 |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2004 |
Keywords
- Equipment Failure Analysis
- Female
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
- Gamma Cameras
- Humans
- Lung Neoplasms
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Staging
- Radiopharmaceuticals
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Single-Blind Method
- Tomography, Emission-Computed