Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Function, information, and contributions: An evaluation of national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Anal Cancer debuting as Cancer of Unknown Primary

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Rational targeting of population groups and residential areas for colorectal cancer screening

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Publishing your trial protocols with Acta Oncologica; your contribution to scientific transparency

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Risk of multiple colorectal cancer development depends on age and subgroup in individuals with hereditary predisposition

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Linn Rosell
  • Jessica Wihl
  • Oskar Hagberg
  • Björn Ohlsson
  • Mef Nilbert
View graph of relations

National virtual multidisciplinary team meetings have been established in Swedish cancer care in response to centralized treatment of rare cancers. Though national meetings grant access to a large multidisciplinary network, we hypothesized that video-based meetings may challenge participants' contributions to the case discussions. We investigated participants' views and used observational tools to assess contributions from various health professionals during the multidisciplinary team meetings. Data on participants' views were collected using an electronic survey distributed to participants in six national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers. Data from observations were obtained from the multidisciplinary team meetings for penile cancer, anal cancer, and vulvar cancer using the standardized observational tools Meeting Observational Tool and Metric of Decision-Making that assess multidisciplinary team meeting functionality and participants' contributions to the case discussions. Participants overall rated the multidisciplinary team meetings favorably with high scores for development of individual competence and team competence. Lower scores applied to multidisciplinary team meeting technology, principles for communicating treatment recommendations, and guidelines for evaluating the meetings. Observational assessment resulted in high scores for case histories, leadership, and teamwork, whereas patient-centered care and involvement of care professionals received low scores. National virtual multidisciplinary team meetings are feasible and receive positive ratings by the participants. Case discussions cover medical perspectives well, whereas patient-centered aspects achieve less attention. Based on these findings, we discuss factors to consider to further improve treatment recommendations from national multidisciplinary team meetings.

Original languageEnglish
JournalRare Tumors
Volume11
ISSN2036-3605
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 May 2019

    Research areas

  • cross-sectional study, healthcare survey, multidisciplinary team conference, patient perspectives, Tumor board

ID: 57229048