Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fully quantitative pixel-wise analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion improves discrimination of dark rim artifact from perfusion defects associated with epicardial coronary stenosis

Allison D Ta, Li-Yueh Hsu, Hannah M Conn, Susanne Winkler, Anders M Greve, Sujata M Shanbhag, Marcus Y Chen, W Patricia Bandettini, Andrew E Arai

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dark rim artifacts in first-pass cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion images can mimic perfusion defects and affect diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease (CAD). We evaluated whether quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) can differentiate dark rim artifacts from true perfusion defects in CMR perfusion.

METHODS: Regadenoson perfusion CMR was performed at 1.5 T in 76 patients. Significant CAD was defined by quantitative invasive coronary angiography (QCA) ≥ 50% diameter stenosis. Non-significant CAD (NonCAD) was defined as stenosis by QCA < 50% diameter stenosis or computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTA) < 30% in all major epicardial arteries. Dark rim artifacts had study specific and guideline-based definitions for comparison purposes. MBF was quantified at the pixel-level and sector-level.

RESULTS: In a NonCAD subgroup with dark rim artifacts, stress MBF was lower in the subendocardial than midmyocardial and epicardial layers (2.17 ± 0.61 vs. 3.06 ± 0.75 vs. 3.24 ± 0.80 mL/min/g, both p < 0.001) and was also 30% lower than in remote regions (2.17 ± 0.61 vs. 2.83 ± 0.67 mL/min/g, p < 0.001). However, subendocardial stress MBF in dark rim artifacts was 37-56% higher than in true perfusion defects (2.17 ± 0.61 vs. 0.95 ± 0.43 mL/min/g, p < 0.001). Absolute stress MBF differentiated CAD from NonCAD with an accuracy ranging from 86 to 89% (all p < 0.001) using pixel-level analyses. Similar results were seen at a sector level.

CONCLUSION: Quantitative stress MBF is lower in dark rim artifacts than remote myocardium but significantly higher than in true perfusion defects. If confirmed in larger series, this approach may aid the interpretation of clinical stress perfusion exams.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00027170 ; first posted 11/28/2001; updated 11/27/2017.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Volume20
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)16
ISSN1532-429X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Artifacts
  • Blood Flow Velocity
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging
  • Coronary Circulation
  • Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging
  • Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methods
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Purines/administration & dosage
  • Pyrazoles/administration & dosage
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Vasodilator Agents/administration & dosage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fully quantitative pixel-wise analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion improves discrimination of dark rim artifact from perfusion defects associated with epicardial coronary stenosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this