Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

From age to physiological reserve: Frailty and muscle strength in early postoperative outcomes after abdominal surgery

  • Elena Montanari
  • , Virginia Boccardi
  • , Eugenia Semeraro
  • , Alessandra Marano
  • , Mauro Santarelli
  • , Silvia Malerba
  • , Francesco Paolo Prete
  • , Mario Testini
  • , Sergii Girnyi
  • , Jaroslaw Skokowski
  • , Mathias Schlögl
  • , Morten Tange Kristensen
  • , Luigi Marano*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Background: Chronological age is widely used to estimate surgical risk but may inadequately reflect early postoperative recovery. Markers of physiological reserve, including frailty and muscle strength, may better capture vulnerability to surgical stress. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study of 223 adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Frailty was assessed using a phenotype-based model, and handgrip strength (HGS) was measured at admission and discharge, with 90-day follow-up in a subset. Length of stay (LOS) and postoperative complications were analyzed using multivariable regression. Results: Frailty independently predicted prolonged LOS and postoperative morbidity, whereas age did not. Oncologic surgery showed the strongest association with extended hospitalization. Higher preoperative HGS was independently associated with shorter LOS. Acute perioperative changes in HGS were not associated with outcomes. Conclusions: Early postoperative recovery appears more closely related to physiological reserve than to age.

Original languageEnglish
Article number117014
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume258
ISSN0002-9610
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2026

Keywords

  • Frailty
  • Handgrip
  • Length of stay
  • Physiological reserve
  • Postoperative outcomes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From age to physiological reserve: Frailty and muscle strength in early postoperative outcomes after abdominal surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this