4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Calculating the free testosterone level has gained increasing interest and different indirect algorithms have been suggested. The objective was to compare free androgen index (FAI), free testosterone estimated using the linear binding model (Vermeulen: cFTV) and the binding framework accounting for allosterically coupled SHBG monomers (Zakharov: cFTZ) in relation to cardiometabolic conditions.

Design: A prospective cohort study including 5350 men, aged 30-70 years, participating in population-based surveys (MONICA I-III and Inter99) from 1982 to 2001 and followed until December 2012 with baseline and follow-up information on cardiometabolic parameters and vital status.

Results: Using age-standardized hormone levels, FAI was higher among men with baseline cardiometabolic conditions, whereas cFTV and cFTZ levels were lower compared to men without these conditions as also seen for total testosterone. Men in highest quartiles of cFTV or cFTZ had lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes (cFTV: HR = 0.74 (0.49-1.10), cFTZ: HR = 0.59 (0.39-0.91)) than men in lowest quartile. In contrast, men with highest levels of FAI had a 74% (1.17-2.59) increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to men in lowest quartile.

Conclusion: The association of estimated free testosterone and the studied outcomes differ depending on algorithm used. cFTV and cFTZ showed similar associations to baseline and long-term cardiometabolic parameters. In contrast, an empiric ratio, FAI, showed opposite associations to several of the examined parameters and may reflect limited clinical utility.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEndocrine Connections
Volume10
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)220-229
Number of pages10
ISSN2049-3614
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

Keywords

  • Follow-up study
  • Free testosterone
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Total testosterone

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Free testosterone and cardiometabolic parameters in men: comparison of algorithms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this