Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fibre type differences in the organisation of mononuclear cells and myonuclei at the tips of human myofibres

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The myotendinous junction (MTJ) is a weak link in the musculoskeletal system. Here, we isolated the tips of single myofibres from healthy (non-injured) human hamstring muscles for confocal microscopy (n=6) and undertook RNAscope in situ hybridisation (n=6) to gain insight into the profiles of cells and myonuclei in this region, in a fibre type manner. A marked presence of mononuclear cells was observed coating the myofibre tips (confirmed by serial block face scanning electron microscopy and cryosection immunofluorescence), with higher numbers for type I (median 29; range 16-63) than type II (16; 9-23) myofibres (P<0.05). The number of these cells expressing COL22A1 was comparable between fibre types. Myonuclear number and density gradually increased from the myofibre proper towards the tip for both fibre types (P<0.05). COL22A1 was expressed by similar proportions of myonuclei in type I (median 26%; range 13-56) and type II (19%; 3-67) myofibre tips. 70% of the COL22A1-positive nuclei in the MTJ region were myonuclei, and the remaining 30% were MTJ cells. This insight refines our fundamental understanding of the human MTJ at the cell and structural levels.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberjcs263660
JournalJournal of Cell Science
Volume138
Issue number2
ISSN0021-9533
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Cell Nucleus/metabolism
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Leukocytes, Mononuclear/metabolism
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Muscle Fibers, Skeletal/metabolism
  • Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism
  • Myofibrils/metabolism
  • Myotendinous junction
  • COL22A1
  • Fibre types
  • Myonuclear domain
  • Spinning disc confocal microscopy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fibre type differences in the organisation of mononuclear cells and myonuclei at the tips of human myofibres'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this