Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Exploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - an interpretive description of the clinician perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Group-based, person-centered diabetes self-management education: healthcare professionals' implementation of new approaches

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Access to cardiac rehabilitation and the role of language barriers in the provision of cardiac rehabilitation to migrants

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Dementia and immigrant groups: a qualitative study of challenges related to identifying, assessing, and diagnosing dementia

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl
  • Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
  • Niels Henrik Hjollund
  • Erik Riiskjær
  • Kirsten Lomborg
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based follow-up is a new model of service delivery, where PRO measures are used as the very basis for demand-driven outpatient follow-up in patients with chronic diseases. Adopting the clinicians' perspective, we aimed to explore what happens when PRO-based follow-up is implemented in routine clinical practice. We also aimed to identify organisational mechanisms related to PRO-based follow-up.

METHODS: The methodological approach of this interview study is interpretive description, informed by a perspective of critical realism. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 clinicians (eight nurses and five physicians) working with PRO-based follow-up in outpatient care for epilepsy in the Central Denmark Region.

RESULTS: PRO-based follow-up gave rise to ambivalence in clinicians. Seen from the clinicians' perspective, PRO-based follow-up could both increase and decrease the quality of follow-up. Moreover, PRO-based follow-up both enhanced and impaired clinicians' work experiences. Additionally, the clinicians used strategies to ease some of the perceived disadvantages. The clinicians did extra tasks and worked around the scope of PRO-based follow-up. Thus, clinicians constituted a professional buffer as they deflected some of the negative mechanisms associated with PRO-based follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: As a model of a service delivery, PRO-based follow-up is highly dependent on the clinicians' day-to-day management of the system, and mechanisms related to routine use of PRO measures in outpatient follow-up are complex. Paying attention to the organisational settings is critical for PRO-based follow-up to improve quality of care and enhance patient-centred care.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume18
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)546
ISSN1472-6963
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jul 2018
Externally publishedYes

ID: 54774347