Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Evidence-based Danish guidelines for screening of diabetic retinopathy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Low physical activity and higher use of screen devices are associated with myopia at the age of 16-17 years in the CCC2000 Eye Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Loss of retinal tension and permanent decrease in retinal function: a new porcine model of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Prevalence and histopathological signatures of optic disc drusen based on microscopy of 1713 enucleated eyes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Primary congenital glaucoma in Denmark, 1977-2016

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Low physical activity and higher use of screen devices are associated with myopia at the age of 16-17 years in the CCC2000 Eye Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Loss of retinal tension and permanent decrease in retinal function: a new porcine model of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Prevalence and histopathological signatures of optic disc drusen based on microscopy of 1713 enucleated eyes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Reply: Is automated screening for DR indeed not yet ready as stated by Grauslund et al?

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  • Jakob Grauslund
  • Nis Andersen
  • Jens Andresen
  • Per Flesner
  • Per Haamann
  • Steffen Heegaard
  • Michael Larsen
  • Caroline Schmidt Laugesen
  • Katja Schielke
  • Jesper Skov
  • Toke Bek
View graph of relations

PURPOSE: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is among the leading causes of visual loss in the working-age population. It is generally accepted that screening of DR is cost-effective and can detect DR before it becomes sight-threatening to allow timely treatment.

METHODS: A group of retinal specialists was formed by the Danish Ophthalmological Society with the aim to formulate contemporary evidence-based guidelines for screening of DR in order to implement these in the Danish screening system.

RESULTS: We hereby present evidence for DR-screening regarding (1) classification of DR, (2) examination techniques, (3) screening intervals and (4) automated screening. It is our recommendation that the International Clinical Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale should be used to classify DR. As a minimum, mydriatic two-field disc- and macular-centred images are required. In the case of suspected clinically significant diabetic macular oedema, supplementary optical coherence tomography can increase the diagnostic accuracy. There is solid evidence to support a flexible, individualized screening regimen. In particular, it is possible to prolong screening intervals to 24-48 months for patients with no or mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), but it is also possible to use extended intervals of 12-24 months for patients with moderate NPDR given that these are well-regulated regarding glycaemic control (HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol) and blood pressure (≤130/80 mmHg). Automated screening of DR is encouraging but is not ready for implementation at present.

CONCLUSION: Danish evidenced-based guidelines for screening of DR support high-quality imaging and allow flexible, individualized screening intervals with a potential for extension to patients with low risk of DR progression.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Ophthalmologica
Volume96
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)763-769
Number of pages7
ISSN1755-375X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

    Research areas

  • Denmark/epidemiology, Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology, Humans, Mass Screening/standards, Morbidity/trends, Ophthalmology, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Societies, Medical

ID: 56464073