Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Patient-Specific Computer Simulation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Echocardiographic Predictors of Mortality in Women With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Left Atrial Function in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Prognostic Importance of Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony in Predicting Cardiovascular Death in the General Population

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for acute intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Time trends in the risk of atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke in patients with peripheral artery disease between 1997 and 2015

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Interaction of ischaemic postconditioning and thrombectomy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Unreported exclusion and sampling bias in interpretation of randomized controlled trials in patients with STEMI

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Jelmer Westra
  • Shengxian Tu
  • Simon Winther
  • Louise Nissen
  • Mai-Britt Vestergaard
  • Birgitte Krogsgaard Andersen
  • Emil Nielsen Holck
  • Camilla Fox Maule
  • Jane Kirk Johansen
  • Lene Nyhus Andreasen
  • Jo Krogsgaard Simonsen
  • Yimin Zhang
  • Steen Dalby Kristensen
  • Michael Maeng
  • Anne Kaltoft
  • Christian Juhl Terkelsen
  • Lars Romer Krusell
  • Lars Jakobsen
  • Johan H C Reiber
  • Jens Flensted Lassen
  • Morten Bøttcher
  • Hans Erik Bøtker
  • Evald Høj Christiansen
  • Niels Ramsing Holm
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel diagnostic modality for functional testing of coronary artery stenosis without the use of pressure wires and induction of hyperemia. QFR is based on computation of standard invasive coronary angiographic imaging. The purpose of WIFI II (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II) was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of QFR in unselected consecutive patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS: WIFI II was a predefined substudy to the Dan-NICAD study (Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease), referring 362 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomographic angiography for diagnostic invasive coronary angiography. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) was measured in all segments with 30% to 90% diameter stenosis. Blinded observers calculated QFR (Medis Medical Imaging bv, The Netherlands) for comparison with FFR. FFR was measured in 292 lesions from 191 patients. Ten (5%) and 9 patients (5%) were excluded because of FFR and angiographic core laboratory criteria, respectively. QFR was successfully computed in 240 out of 255 lesions (94%) with a mean diameter stenosis of 50±12%. Mean difference between FFR and QFR was 0.01±0.08. QFR correctly classified 83% of the lesions using FFR with cutoff at 0.80 as reference standard. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.91) with a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 77%, 86%, 75%, and 87%, respectively. A QFR-FFR hybrid approach based on the present results enables wire-free and adenosine-free procedures in 68% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS: Functional lesion evaluation by QFR assessment showed good agreement and diagnostic accuracy compared with FFR. Studies comparing clinical outcome after QFR- and FFR-based diagnostic strategies are required.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02264717.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCirculation. Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume11
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)e007107
ISSN1941-9651
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

ID: 56521223