TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating Danish Breast Cancer Group locoregional radiotherapy guideline adherence in clinical treatment data 2008-2016
T2 - The DBCG RT Nation study
AU - Refsgaard, Lasse
AU - Skarsø Buhl, Emma
AU - Yates, Esben
AU - Maae, Else
AU - Berg, Martin
AU - Al-Rawi, Sami
AU - Saini, Abhilasha
AU - Vestmø Maraldo, Maja
AU - Boye, Kristian
AU - Louise Holm Milo, Marie
AU - Jensen, Ingelise
AU - Wichmann Matthiessen, Louise
AU - Nørring Bekke, Susanne
AU - Holck Nielsen, Mette
AU - Laugaard Lorenzen, Ebbe
AU - Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Lise
AU - Sofia Korreman, Stine
AU - Vrou Offersen, Birgitte
N1 - Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Guideline adherence in radiotherapy is crucial for maintaining treatment quality and consistency, particularly in non-trial patient settings where most treatments occur. The study aimed to assess the impact of guideline changes on treatment planning practices and compare manual registry data accuracy with treatment planning data.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilised the DBCG RT Nation cohort, a collection of breast cancer radiotherapy data in Denmark, to evaluate adherence to guidelines from 2008 to 2016. The cohort included 7448 high-risk breast cancer patients. National guideline changes included, fractionation, introduction of respiratory gating, irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes, use of the simultaneous integrated boost technique and inclusion of the Left Anterior Descending coronary artery in delineation practice. Methods for structure name mapping, laterality detection, detection of temporal changes in population mean lung volume, and dose evaluation were presented and applied. Manually registered treatment characteristic data was obtained from the Danish Breast Cancer Database for comparison.RESULTS: The study found immediate and consistent adherence to guideline changes across Danish radiotherapy centres. Treatment practices before guideline implementation were documented and showed a variation among centres. Discrepancies between manual registry data and actual treatment planning data were as high as 10% for some measures.CONCLUSION: National guideline changes could be detected in the routine treatment data, with a high degree of compliance and short implementation time. Data extracted from treatment planning data files provides a more accurate and detailed characterisation of treatments and guideline adherence than medical register data.
AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Guideline adherence in radiotherapy is crucial for maintaining treatment quality and consistency, particularly in non-trial patient settings where most treatments occur. The study aimed to assess the impact of guideline changes on treatment planning practices and compare manual registry data accuracy with treatment planning data.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilised the DBCG RT Nation cohort, a collection of breast cancer radiotherapy data in Denmark, to evaluate adherence to guidelines from 2008 to 2016. The cohort included 7448 high-risk breast cancer patients. National guideline changes included, fractionation, introduction of respiratory gating, irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes, use of the simultaneous integrated boost technique and inclusion of the Left Anterior Descending coronary artery in delineation practice. Methods for structure name mapping, laterality detection, detection of temporal changes in population mean lung volume, and dose evaluation were presented and applied. Manually registered treatment characteristic data was obtained from the Danish Breast Cancer Database for comparison.RESULTS: The study found immediate and consistent adherence to guideline changes across Danish radiotherapy centres. Treatment practices before guideline implementation were documented and showed a variation among centres. Discrepancies between manual registry data and actual treatment planning data were as high as 10% for some measures.CONCLUSION: National guideline changes could be detected in the routine treatment data, with a high degree of compliance and short implementation time. Data extracted from treatment planning data files provides a more accurate and detailed characterisation of treatments and guideline adherence than medical register data.
KW - Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
KW - Denmark
KW - Female
KW - Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic
KW - Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards
KW - Registries
KW - Data science
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Radiotherapy
KW - Guidelines
KW - Quality assurance
KW - Big data
KW - DICOM
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198272575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110289
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110289
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38944554
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 199
JO - Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
M1 - 110289
ER -