Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Inferior vena cava filters

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Pitfalls of clinical practice guidelines in the era of broken science: Let's raise the standards

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Deep neuromuscular blockade and surgical conditions during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: A randomised, blinded study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Device or target? A paradigm shift in airway management: Implications for guidelines, clinical practice and teaching

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Pitfalls of clinical practice guidelines in the era of broken science: Let's raise the standards

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Device or target? A paradigm shift in airway management: Implications for guidelines, clinical practice and teaching

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Mechanical prophylaxis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • ESA VTE Guidelines Task Force
  • Raquel Ferrandis Comes
  • Patrick Mismetti
  • Arash Afshari
View graph of relations

: The indications for the use of an inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) in the context of deep venous thrombosis to prevent pulmonary embolism remain controversial. Despite wide use in clinical practice, great variation exists in national and international guidelines in regard to the indications. In addition, clinical practice is based on poor-quality data from trauma and bariatric surgery with a high incidence of complications. It is often difficult to assess their efficacy and lack of filter retrieval appears to be a substantial issue compared with a potential benefit by insertion of these devices. Complications usually refer to increased risk of deep venous thrombosis, filter perforation, filter penetration, filter migration, inferior vena cava occlusion and subsequently failure in pulmonary embolism prevention. Evidence from low-quality studies or registries, with small numbers of patients and conflicting findings, does not allow for a strong recommendation for or against the use of IVCFs. IVCFs should only be considered in cases of very high risk of pulmonary embolism and in perioperative situations at very high risk of bleeding, resulting in a prolonged contra-indication to pharmacological prophylaxis.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology
Volume35
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)108-111
Number of pages4
ISSN0265-0215
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

ID: 56254819