Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

European Academy of Neurology/European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium position statement on diagnostic disclosure, biomarker counseling, and management of patients with mild cognitive impairment

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Antiherpetic medication and incident dementia: Observational cohort studies in four countries

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Effect of intravenous alteplase on post-stroke depression in the WAKE UP trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Chronic migraine: Genetics or environment?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Barriers in access to dementia care in minority ethnic groups in Denmark: a qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment in the European Union: a Delphi expert study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Antiherpetic medication and incident dementia: Observational cohort studies in four countries

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Stress diagnoses in midlife and risk of dementia: a register-based follow-up study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Careful counseling through the diagnostic process and adequate postdiagnostic support in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is important. Previous studies have indicated heterogeneity in practice and the need for guidance for clinicians.

METHODS: A joint European Academy of Neurology/European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium panel of dementia specialists was appointed. Through online meetings and emails, positions were developed regarding disclosing a syndrome diagnosis of MCI, pre- and postbiomarker sampling counseling, and postdiagnostic support.

RESULTS: Prior to diagnostic evaluation, motives and wishes of the patient should be sought. Diagnostic disclosure should be carried out by a dementia specialist taking the ethical principles of "the right to know" versus "the wish not to know" into account. Disclosure should be accompanied by written information and a follow-up plan. It should be made clear that MCI is not dementia. Prebiomarker counseling should always be carried out if biomarker sampling is considered and postbiomarker counseling if sampling is carried out. A dementia specialist knowledgeable about biomarkers should inform about pros and cons, including alternatives, to enable an autonomous and informed decision. Postbiomarker counseling will depend in part on the results of biomarkers. Follow-up should be considered for all patients with MCI and include brain-healthy advice and possibly treatment for specific underlying causes. Advice on advance directives may be relevant.

CONCLUSIONS: Guidance to clinicians on various aspects of the diagnostic process in patients with MCI is presented here as position statements. Further studies are needed to enable more evidence-based and standardized recommendations in the future.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Neurology
Volume28
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)2147-2155
Number of pages9
ISSN1351-5101
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

    Research areas

  • biomarker counseling, dementia, diagnostic disclosure, mild cognitive impairment, postdiagnostic support

ID: 61757468