TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating Renal Function Following Lung Transplantation
AU - Hornum, Mads
AU - Houlind, Morten Baltzer
AU - Iversen, Esben
AU - Porrini, Esteban
AU - Luis-Lima, Sergio
AU - Oturai, Peter
AU - Iversen, Martin
AU - Bredahl, Pia
AU - Carlsen, Jørn
AU - Møller, Christian Holdflood
AU - Andersen, Mads Jønsson
AU - Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo
AU - Perch, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/3/9
Y1 - 2022/3/9
N2 - Background: Patients undergoing lung transplantation (LTx) experience a rapid decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the acute postoperative period. However, no prospective longitudinal studies directly comparing the performance of equations for estimating GFR in this patient population currently exist. Methods: In total, 32 patients undergoing LTx met the study criteria. At pre-LTx and 1-, 3-, and 12-weeks post-LTx, GFR was determined by51 Cr-EDTA and by equations for estimating GFR based on plasma (P)-Creatinine, P-Cystatin C, or a combination of both. Results: Measured GFR declined from 98.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 at pre-LTx to 54.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 12-weeks post-LTx. Equations based on P-Creatinine underestimated GFR decline after LTx, whereas equations based on P-Cystatin C overestimated this decline. Overall, the 2021 CKD-EPI combination equation had the lowest bias and highest precision at both pre-LTx and post-LTx. Conclusions: Caution must be applied when interpreting renal function based on equations for estimating GFR in the acute postoperative period following LTx. Simplified methods for measuring GFR may allow for more widespread use of measured GFR in this vulnerable patient population.
AB - Background: Patients undergoing lung transplantation (LTx) experience a rapid decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the acute postoperative period. However, no prospective longitudinal studies directly comparing the performance of equations for estimating GFR in this patient population currently exist. Methods: In total, 32 patients undergoing LTx met the study criteria. At pre-LTx and 1-, 3-, and 12-weeks post-LTx, GFR was determined by51 Cr-EDTA and by equations for estimating GFR based on plasma (P)-Creatinine, P-Cystatin C, or a combination of both. Results: Measured GFR declined from 98.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 at pre-LTx to 54.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 12-weeks post-LTx. Equations based on P-Creatinine underestimated GFR decline after LTx, whereas equations based on P-Cystatin C overestimated this decline. Overall, the 2021 CKD-EPI combination equation had the lowest bias and highest precision at both pre-LTx and post-LTx. Conclusions: Caution must be applied when interpreting renal function based on equations for estimating GFR in the acute postoperative period following LTx. Simplified methods for measuring GFR may allow for more widespread use of measured GFR in this vulnerable patient population.
KW - Cystatin c
KW - Estimated glomerular filtration rate
KW - Immunosuppression
KW - Lung transplantation
KW - Measured glomerular filtration rate
KW - cystatin c
KW - estimated glomerular filtration rate
KW - measured glomerular filtration rate
KW - immunosuppression
KW - lung transplantation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126055667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jcm11061496
DO - 10.3390/jcm11061496
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35329822
AN - SCOPUS:85126055667
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 11
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 6
M1 - 1496
ER -