Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Epidemiology of placenta previa accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Wexner score and quality of life in women with obstetric anal sphincter injury

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Next Generation Sequencing-Based Fetal ABO Blood Group Prediction by Analysis of Cell-Free DNA from Maternal Plasma

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Blødning i tredje trimester og placentakomplikationer

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterEducationpeer-review

  4. Continuous focus on preventive strategies and follow-up is important for a change

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of placenta previa complicated by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and to examine the different criteria being used for the diagnosis.

DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov and MEDLINE were searched between August 1982 and September 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting on placenta previa complicated by PAS diagnosed in a defined obstetric population.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers performed the data extraction using a predefined protocol and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies, with difference agreed by consensus. The primary outcomes were overall prevalence of placenta previa, incidence of PAS according to the type of placenta previa and the reported clinical outcomes, including the number of peripartum hysterectomies and direct maternal mortality. The secondary outcomes included the criteria used for the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of placenta previa and the criteria used to diagnose and grade PAS at birth.

RESULTS: A total of 258 articles were reviewed and 13 retrospective and 7 prospective studies were included in the analysis, which reported on 587 women with placenta previa and PAS. The meta-analysis indicated a significant (p<0.001) heterogeneity between study estimates for the prevalence of placenta previa, the prevalence of placenta previa with PAS and the incidence of PAS in the placenta previa cohort. The median prevalence of placenta previa was 0.56% (IQR 0.39-1.24) whereas the median prevalence of placenta previa with PAS was 0.07% (IQR 0.05-0.16). The incidence of PAS in women with a placenta previa was 11.10% (IQR 7.65-17.35).

CONCLUSIONS: The high heterogeneity in qualitative and diagnostic data between studies emphasises the need to implement standardised protocols for the diagnoses of both placenta previa and PAS, including the type of placenta previa and grade of villous invasiveness.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017068589.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)e031193
ISSN2044-6055
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Nov 2019

ID: 59154298