Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Ensuring basic competency in chest tube insertion using a simulated scenario: an international validation study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Development and validation of a multiple-choice questionnaire-based theoretical test in direct ophthalmoscopy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Decentralized virtual reality mastoidectomy simulation training: a prospective, mixed-methods study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Simulation-Based Training of Ultrasound-Guided Procedures in Radiology - A Systematic Review

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: A Delphi-based general needs assessment

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Using virtual-reality simulation to ensure basic competence in hysteroscopy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Introduction: Chest tube insertion can be associated with serious complications. A structured training programme is needed to minimise complications and enhance patient safety. Novices should pass a reliable test with solid evidence of validity before performing the procedure supervised on patients. The aim of this study was to establish a credible pass/fail standard.

Methods: We used an established assessment tool the Chest Tube Insertion Competency Test (TUBE-iCOMPT). Validity evidence was explored according to Messick's five sources of validity. Two methods were used to establish a credible pass/fail standard. Contrasting groups' method: 34 doctors (23 novices and 11 experienced surgeons) performed the procedure twice and all procedures were video recorded, edited, blinded and rated by two independent, international raters. Modified Angoff method: seven thoracic surgeons individually determined the scores that defined the pass/fail criteria. The data was gathered in Copenhagen, Denmark and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Results: Internal consistency reliability was calculated as Cronbach's alpha to 0.94. The generalisability coefficient with two raters and two procedures was 0.91. Mean scores were 50.7 (SD±13.2) and 74.7 (SD±4.8) for novices and experienced surgeons, respectively (p<0.001). The pass/fail score of 62 points resulted in zero false negatives and only three false positives.

Discussion: We have gathered valuable additional validity evidence for the assessment tool TUBE-iCOMPT including establishment of a credible pass/fail score. The TUBE-iCOMPT can now be integrated in mastery learning programmes to ensure competency before independent practice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Open Respiratory Research
Volume5
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)e000362
ISSN2052-4439
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

ID: 56242708