Endometrial preparation protocols prior to frozen embryo transfer - convenience or safety?

Åsa Magnusson*, Hans Ivar Hanevik, Hannele Laivuori, Anne Loft, Terhi Piltonen, Anja Pinborg, Christina Bergh

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

The number of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles is increasing rapidly worldwide. Different endometrial preparations for FET result in comparable live birth rates. However, several recent publications have reported higher maternal risks for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), pre-eclampsia and postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in programmed cycles (PC-FET) compared with natural cycles and modified natural cycles with an intact corpus luteum. Nevertheless, PC-FET is frequently used in ovulatory women despite the increased risks for HDP, pre-eclampsia and PPH. Although randomized controlled studies have been suggested, PC-FET raises several methodological problems. Large study populations would be required to investigate the outcomes in question, and the inclusion of ovulatory women, where the intervention may increase the risk of a negative outcome, is ethically troublesome. In the authors' opinion, the existing evidence from large observational studies and systematic reviews is sufficiently strong to recommend an endometrial preparation strategy that aims to maintain or stimulate the corpus luteum to minimize the risk of HDP and pre-eclampsia after FET cycles.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103587
JournalReproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume48
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)1-4
Number of pages4
ISSN1472-6483
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Birth Rate
  • Corpus Luteum
  • Cryopreservation/methods
  • Embryo Transfer/adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Pre-Eclampsia
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Rate
  • Retrospective Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Endometrial preparation protocols prior to frozen embryo transfer - convenience or safety?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this