Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Electronic symptom monitoring in patients with metastatic lung cancer: a feasibility study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Total burden of disease in cancer patients at diagnosis-a Danish nationwide study of multimorbidity and redeemed medication

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. eHealth-mind the gap

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Electronic reporting of patient-reported outcomes in a fragile and comorbid population during cancer therapy - a feasibility study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Telemedicine and e-Health Solutions for COVID-19: Patients' Perspective

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Expectations to Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) in Oncology - PRO for a purpose, when and how?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Rasmus Blechingberg Friis
  • Niels Henrik Hjollund
  • Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl
  • Helle Pappot
  • Halla Skuladottir
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: To design an electronic questionnaire for symptom monitoring and to evaluate the feasibility, usability and acceptability when applied to patients with metastatic lung cancer.

SETTING: Single-centre feasibility study.

PARTICIPANTS: Patients with stage IV lung cancer in antineoplastic treatment.

INTERVENTIONS: This study describes the first three phases of a complex intervention design: phase 1, development of the intervention; phase 2, feasibility testing and phase 3, evaluation of the intervention. In phase 1, items were selected for the questionnaire and adjusted following patient interviews. In phase 2, patients completed the electronic questionnaire weekly during a 3-week feasibility test. In case of symptom deterioration, a nurse was notified with the aim to contact the patient. In phase 3, patients evaluated phase 2 by paper questionnaires, and interviews were conducted with the participating nurses.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The study outcomes: phase 1, usability and relevance; phase 2, recruitment rate, compliance and threshold functionality and phase 3, usability, acceptability and relevance.

RESULTS: In phase 1, a questionnaire was designed and reviewed by patients (n=8). The interviews revealed high usability and relevance of the intervention.For phases 2 and 3, 20 of 29 approached patients (69%) responded to the questionnaire on a weekly basis. Two patients did not complete any questionnaires (compliance 90%). The remaining 18 patients completed 65 of a total of 72 possible questionnaires (7 missed, 93% completed). Reported symptoms led to a phone call from a nurse in 30% of the responses.The patients reported high usability and acceptability of questionnaire and software. The substance of the telephonic conversations was relevant, and the study set-up was logistically acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS: An electronic questionnaire designed for symptom monitoring revealed high usability, acceptability and relevance in the target population. In conclusion, the study set-up was considered feasible for a randomised controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03529851.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Open
Volume10
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)e035673
ISSN2044-6055
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jun 2020

ID: 60921173