Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Electroencephalographic Parameters Differentiating Melancholic Depression, Non-melancholic Depression, and Healthy Controls. A Systematic Review

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Digital Shared Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Mood and Activity Measured Using Smartphones in Unipolar Depressive Disorder

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Assessment of Suicide Risks During the First Week Immediately After Discharge From Psychiatric Inpatient Facility

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Automatically Generated Smartphone Data in Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Bipolar Disorder and Healthy Controls

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Incomplete systematic review and meta-analysis on statin use and depression risk - A commentary

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  2. Primary prevention of depression: An umbrella review of controlled interventions

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Risk of depression after diagnostic prostate cancer workup - A nationwide, registry-based study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Introduction: The objective of this systematic review was to investigate whether electroencephalographic parameters can serve as a tool to distinguish between melancholic depression, non-melancholic depression, and healthy controls in adults. Methods: A systematic review comprising an extensive literature search conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO in August 2020 with monthly updates until November 1st, 2020. In addition, we performed a citation search and scanned reference lists. Clinical trials that performed an EEG-based examination on an adult patient group diagnosed with melancholic unipolar depression and compared with a control group of non-melancholic unipolar depression and/or healthy controls were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed by the Strengthening of Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. Results: A total of 24 studies, all case-control design, met the inclusion criteria and could be divided into three subgroups: Resting state studies (n = 5), sleep EEG studies (n = 10), and event-related potentials (ERP) studies (n = 9). Within each subgroup, studies were characterized by marked variability on almost all levels, preventing pooling of data, and many studies were subject to weighty methodological problems. However, the main part of the studies identified one or several EEG parameters that differentiated the groups. Conclusions: Multiple EEG modalities showed an ability to distinguish melancholic patients from non-melancholic patients and/or healthy controls. The considerable heterogeneity across studies and the frequent methodological difficulties at the individual study level were the main limitations to this work. Also, the underlying premise of shifting diagnostic paradigms may have resulted in an inhomogeneous patient population. Systematic Review Registration: Registered in the PROSPERO registry on August 8th, 2020, registration number CRD42020197472.

Original languageEnglish
Article number648713
JournalFrontiers in Psychiatry
Volume12
Pages (from-to)648713
ISSN1664-0640
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2021 Bruun, Arnbjerg and Kessing.

ID: 68338761